By Haggari Nakashe
There's a word in Japanese, ma, that doesn't translate cleanly into English. It refers to the gap. The pause. The negative space between things that isn't empty so much as it's charged. Architecture uses it. Martial arts use it. It describes the moment before the strike, the silence between the notes, the doorway as distinct from the rooms on either side of it.
The composers and sound artists who built experimental electronic and electroacoustic music weren't reading Japanese aesthetics theory, mostly. But they found the same thing. They kept finding it, independently, across decades and continents and wildly different methods, which suggests they weren't discovering a technique so much as uncovering something that was already there, waiting in the physics of sound itself.
I keep returning to this idea because it describes something I've been chasing for a long time, that space, that gap, that pressure that lives in the silence between events. It's easier to gesture at than to explain. But I'll try.
 |
| Ma (間) |
Heaviness, real heaviness, has almost nothing to do with volume.
This is the first thing you have to unlearn. Volume is easy. Any idiot can turn a knob. What the slow and minimal traditions figured out, and what experimental electronic music has been quietly demonstrating since the 1950s, is that weight comes from somewhere else entirely. It comes from duration. From resistance. From the refusal to resolve when resolution is expected. From the willingness to hold a single idea, a single frequency, a single texture, long past the point where conventional music would have moved on.
A note played loud for one second is a sound. The same note held for four minutes becomes a room you are standing inside. Hold it for ten, and it becomes something closer to a geological fact, something that feels like it predates you and will outlast you and has no particular interest in your comfort either way.
That's not metaphor. That's physics.
Sound is pressure. Literally. Waves of compression moving through air, pressing against your eardrum, translated by your body into something your brain calls music. When a frequency sustains long enough, your nervous system stops processing it as an event and starts processing it as an environment. The brain shifts modes. You are no longer tracking something happening. You are inside something that simply is.
Low frequencies compound this dramatically. Sub-bass doesn't just enter through your ears, it enters through your chest, your sternum, the bones of your jaw. There's a reason certain recordings feel physical in a way that other music doesn't. It's not a metaphor when someone says a piece hit them in the body. It actually did. The human body is a resonating chamber, and slow, low, sustained sound plays it like one.
Understanding this changes how you hear almost everything in the experimental tradition. The tools change, the intentions change, the contexts change enormously, but this core mechanic, duration plus low frequency equals physical weight, runs through nearly all of it. It runs through my own work too, in ways I only fully understood by making it, by sitting with synthesizers long enough to feel the difference between a tone that occupies space and one that merely exists in it.
La Monte Young understood it first, or at least said it loudest.
In the early 1960s, while the rest of the avant-garde was busy fragmenting sound into smaller and smaller pieces, Young was doing the opposite. He was holding notes. Single notes, sustained for minutes, sometimes for hours. His Dream House installations, rooms filled with continuous sine wave drones generated by electronic equipment, weren't compositions in any traditional sense. They were environments. You walked in and the sound had already been going. You walked out and it kept going. The music existed independently of any listener, which was a genuinely radical idea at the time and remains a slightly unsettling one now.
What Young was demonstrating, partly through provocation and partly through genuine conviction, was that sustained sound does something to consciousness that sequential, event-based music cannot. When nothing is changing, you start to notice everything. The slight variations in a tone you initially heard as static. The way your own movement through a room changes the frequencies you perceive. The texture of something that seemed textureless. The depth inside what looked like a flat surface.
This is the perceptual shift that drone and sustained-tone music reliably produces, and once you've experienced it, the logic of the whole tradition becomes obvious. You're not being asked to follow something. You're being asked to arrive somewhere and then actually look around.
Terry Riley took that logic and made it accessible without making it lesser.
In C, premiered in 1964, is one of those pieces that sounds simple on paper and turns out to be inexhaustible in practice. Fifty-three short musical phrases, played by any number of musicians, each repeating each phrase as many times as they choose before moving to the next. The result is something that is constantly shifting and completely static at the same time, a living texture that never quite resolves, never quite breaks down, and sounds different every single time it's performed.
What Riley found was that repetition itself is a technology. Not repetition as laziness or limitation, but repetition as a way of wearing down the listener's resistance to the present moment. The first time you hear a phrase you assess it. The second time you compare it to the first. By the tenth time something different is happening: you've stopped analyzing and started inhabiting. The phrase has become part of the furniture of the moment, which frees your attention to notice everything else, the other phrases weaving around it, the slight human imprecision in each repetition, the slowly shifting harmony emerging from the overlap.
This is drone logic applied to melody, and it points toward something that runs through the entire experimental tradition: the idea that music's job isn't always to take you somewhere. Sometimes it's to make you more fully present in the place you already are.
Brian Eno arrived from a completely different direction and reached very similar conclusions.
Coming out of art rock and glam, through his work with Roxy Music and his early solo records, Eno had a kind of instinctive feel for texture and atmosphere that didn't fit anywhere in the rock tradition. The ambient records he started making in the late seventies, Ambient 1: Music for Airports being the most famous, were explicitly designed to be heard without being listened to, which sounds like a contradiction until you experience it.
The idea was that music could function like light, present and affecting and atmospheric without demanding your attention. Music for Airports uses slowly cycling tape loops of processed piano and voice, all in slightly different lengths so they never quite sync up and the combinations are always changing. It's endlessly varied and endlessly calm, never arriving anywhere because it was never trying to get anywhere.
But what Eno was also doing, perhaps less consciously, was creating weight through patience. Those long, slowly cycling textures accumulate. Spend an hour with Music for Airports and you'll notice something has happened to your sense of time, your breathing, the quality of your attention. The music hasn't done anything dramatic. It's just been consistently, patiently itself, and that consistency turns out to have mass.
His later collaboration with Harold Budd, The Plateaux of Mirror, goes further still, into a kind of translucent weightlessness that somehow feels heavier the longer you sit with it. Budd's piano notes are recorded and treated until they float somewhere between attack and decay, never quite striking, never quite fading, existing in a perpetual gentle ambiguity that the ears find both restful and subtly destabilizing. It is music about the moment just after something happens, held in suspension indefinitely.
Pauline Oliveros built a philosophy around exactly this.
Deep Listening, the practice she developed over decades of performance and teaching, is exactly what it sounds like and also much more than it sounds like. It's a method of attending to sound, all sound, environmental and musical and internal, with a quality of awareness that most of us reserve for crisis situations. Not passive hearing, not even active listening in the usual sense, but something closer to what meditators describe as open awareness, a receptivity with no particular object, ready to receive whatever arrives without organizing it prematurely into meaning.
Her electroacoustic compositions practice what the philosophy preaches. They move slowly, they leave space, they include silence not as absence but as material, as something with texture and duration and weight of its own. Recordings like Deep Listening and Crone Music are disorienting on first encounter because they refuse to establish the kind of forward momentum that tells you music is happening. Instead they create conditions. And then they wait.
This is a profoundly different relationship with time than most Western music offers. Most music tells you where you are in it, gives you landmarks, signals progression, lets you know how much is left. Oliveros, like Young, like Eno at his most expansive, removes those signals deliberately. You don't know how long you've been in the piece. You don't know how much is left. All you have is now, which is the whole point.
Éliane Radigue spent fifty years making music that most people still haven't found.
Working almost exclusively with the ARP 2500 synthesizer, a machine she developed an almost symbiotic relationship with over decades, Radigue built compositions of extraordinary patience and depth. Her Trilogie de la Mort, a three-part work running well over two hours, was composed in response to Tibetan Buddhist teachings on death and dying, and it carries that weight without ever announcing it. There are no dramatic gestures. No climaxes. No moments designed to announce themselves as significant.
What there is, consistently and at great length, is change so slow it's almost imperceptible. Tones shift by microtones. Harmonics emerge and dissolve. The texture breathes. And because the changes are so gradual, your perception recalibrates constantly, trying to track something that is always slightly different from what it was a moment ago but never dramatically so. It's like watching light change across an afternoon, something that only becomes visible if you stay in one place long enough.
Radigue's relationship with her synthesizer is one I understand intuitively. There's a particular intimacy that develops between a sound artist and a specific piece of equipment, the way a machine's quirks and tendencies become a vocabulary, the way limitations become a language. My own work with synth drones has been shaped by that kind of long, patient conversation with specific sounds, learning what a frequency wants to do when you give it enough time and space.
Xenakis approached the problem from a completely different angle, and arrived somewhere equally radical.
Where Radigue worked with near-stasis, Iannis Xenakis worked with mass in the literal sense, huge quantities of sound events treated statistically rather than individually. His stochastic compositions used mathematical models to generate textures of such density that individual notes became irrelevant. What you heard instead was a kind of sonic weather, clouds and streams and avalanches of sound that moved and shifted according to their own internal logic.
Metastaseis, Pithoprakta, Achorripsis, these pieces are overwhelming on first encounter, not because they're loud, though they can be, but because they operate at a scale that individual human cognition struggles to process. You can't follow them. You can only be inside them. And being inside them, surrendering the analytical impulse to track and assess, produces something not entirely unlike the experience of Radigue's near-silence or Young's sustained drones. Different route, same destination: the dissolution of the ordinary listening self into something more open, more present, more available.
Contemporary experimental electronic music carries all of this forward, often without knowing it.
Artists working today in drone, dark ambient, and experimental sound design are frequently operating in the same territory that Oliveros and Radigue and Eno mapped, sometimes having studied that tradition directly, sometimes having arrived at similar conclusions independently through the simpler fact that they kept following the sounds that interested them until the sounds led somewhere real.
Grouper, whose work sits at the intersection of folk, ambient, and drone, creates recordings that feel less produced than discovered, as if she found these particular combinations of voice and texture and reverb already existing somewhere and simply captured them. Dragging a Dead Deer Up a Hill is heavy in exactly the way a fog is heavy, not by pressing down but by surrounding you completely until you stop being sure where you end and it begins.
William Basinski's Disintegration Loops takes duration and mass to a conceptual extreme: the recordings document magnetic tape physically deteriorating over the course of the listening experience, the music literally decaying in real time across hours. The weight isn't just sonic. It's temporal. You're hearing something dying, slowly, and the slowness is inseparable from the meaning.
My own record Chamber came from the same place, though I arrived at it differently.
Five tracks built around the relationship between specific frequencies and the emotional experience of depression, not depression as lyrical subject matter, not songs about feeling heavy, but an attempt to find the actual sonic mechanics of it. How particular tonal frequencies interact with the psyche. How simple melodic lines transform through layering into something that evokes simultaneously unease and calm. How you can build a record that is heavy in the way a long winter is heavy: not loud, not violent, not demanding anything of you except that you stay in it long enough for the cold to become familiar.
This is the distinction I keep wanting to make, and that the tradition I've described above keeps proving: heaviness and noise are not the same conversation. Drone can press on your chest just as hard as any distorted guitar riff, through completely different means. Patience is load-bearing. Frequency is structural. You don't need aggression to build something that won't let you go.
Much of what I understand about this I learned in collaboration.
Working with gaop over several records has been an ongoing education in how these ideas translate across different instruments, sensibilities, and approaches. IN DRONE WE TRUST, which the two of us made alongside NishMa across the entirety of 2023, is where a lot of these threads came together most explicitly. Thick drone textures and vast ambient soundscapes, doom and jazz motifs that surface and dissolve, tracks like "Once Against" and "New Soul" running twenty minutes each because twenty minutes was what they needed, not a second less. The record was first made available for streaming through Ranger Magazine before we released it properly, which felt right, it was a slow record that deserved a slow reveal.
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits, which brought NishMa into the three-way collaboration a year prior, took the same instincts into different territory. Sixty-one minutes, three tracks, woodwinds and drums, electric piano and synths, bass, and bells. An exploration of drone, dark jazz, ambient and doom that doesn't resolve into any of those genres cleanly, just moves between them like weather. The opening track "Fruits" runs twenty-five minutes, "Vegetables" runs thirty-three, and the nine minutes of "and" in the middle functions as the comma between two very long thoughts. It's the kind of record the liner notes describe plainly: this is what the devil warned you about. Which is both a joke and also not a joke.
4AU is different from both of those, looser and more immediate, a live session with Sabixatzil on guitar, gaop on clarinet, NishMa on drums, and me on synths, subsequently touched up with a little studio work but not tidied into something it wasn't. Twenty-five minutes of free jazz, noise, drone, and doom occupying the same space at the same time, a Venn diagram of genres that overlaps more than anyone expects until they hear it. The session description calls it a polished-turd piece of noise art, which is accurate, and also undersells it.
This is where jazz enters the picture, and where things get genuinely strange.
The connection between jazz and drone music is not obvious on the surface. Jazz is about movement, improvisation, conversation between players, the pleasure of something unfolding in real time. Drone is about stillness, accumulation, the absence of event. And yet certain jazz musicians have always been drawn toward exactly the qualities that define the drone tradition: the sustained note, the slowly evolving texture, the willingness to let a single idea breathe until it becomes something else.
Bohren & der Club of Gore are the clearest proof that these worlds belong together. Their album Sunset Mission is one of the slowest jazz records ever made and one of the heaviest, though it contains no distorted guitars, no blast beats, none of the conventional markers of heaviness. Just piano, saxophone, bass, drums, all moving at a pace that makes you check whether the record is playing at the right speed. It is. This is what they chose. The result is music that feels like three in the morning in a city where something bad happened recently, all neon and empty streets and the particular weight of hours that won't end.
The Kilimanjaro Darkjazz Ensemble work in similar territory, bringing genuine compositional structure to the dark jazz form, voice and melody and something close to song, but filtered through an atmosphere so heavy it functions more like drone than jazz in any conventional sense. Their record From the Stairwell is the entry point, structured enough to feel welcoming, dark enough to do real damage.
The Mount Fuji Doomjazz Corporation goes further into improvisation and abstraction. Succubus is the essential document, long, slowly unfolding, built on the understanding that jazz and drone share the same fundamental technology: they both work by making you forget about time. I hear it in the collaborative records too, in the way gaop's woodwinds move through drone textures the way a jazz horn moves through changes, finding the space that isn't there and then insisting that it is.
Khanate understood something about weight that almost no one else has matched.
Where most doom metal, even at its most extreme, maintains some relationship to song structure, Khanate dismantled song structure entirely and built something else in its place. Their records are long, slow, and profoundly uncomfortable, not in a challenging-music way but in a this-feels-like-being-inside-someone-else's-worst-experience way. Alan Dubin's vocals don't sing or scream so much as they document, a human voice at the absolute limit of what a human voice can communicate, layered over guitar and bass that move so slowly they seem to be fighting the concept of movement itself. Someone once told me that it's like being dragged across concrete, ,mind you, that was almost two decades before the movie with the same title came out.
What Khanate share with the experimental electronic tradition is the understanding that discomfort is a material. Not shock, not provocation for its own sake, but the specific and carefully maintained experience of being in a place you cannot easily leave. Radigue does this with microtonal drift. Oliveros does it with silence that has too much in it. Khanate does it with volume and slowness and the particular horror of a human voice that has run out of ways to cope. Different tools. The same room.
Sunn O))) are the most obvious bridge between these worlds and have always known it.
Their recordings exist in direct conversation with the drone tradition, they've collaborated with composers from that world, their methods are closer to electroacoustic composition than to rock in any meaningful sense. Standing in the room while they perform, feeling the sub-bass in your skeleton, understanding at a physical level why sustained low frequencies do what they do to the body, is an education in the physics of experimental music that no amount of careful listening through speakers can quite replicate. The robes, the fog, the rituals, that's not affectation. That's them telling you plainly: this is a ceremony. Adjust yourself accordingly.
Earth, particularly the later records from Hex onward, demonstrate what happens when doom tempo is applied to space rather than density. These aren't heavy records in the crushing sense. They're heavy in the way that empty landscapes are heavy, vast and patient and indifferent, full of a silence that turns out to be full of sound if you listen closely enough. Dylan Carlson found his way to something that sounds more like Eno than like Black Sabbath, and the lineage makes complete sense once you hear it.
Sleep's Dopesmoker is different again, ecstatic and communal where Earth is solitary and bleak, but it shares the fundamental commitment: one riff, held and transformed and held again for over an hour, until repetition transcends itself and becomes something closer to ritual than to rock music.
I mention these records not to claim kinship with them, but because they demonstrate something important: the mechanics of heaviness are genre-agnostic. A synthesizer drone and a down-tuned guitar riff, both held long enough, both built around low frequencies and the refusal to resolve, are doing the same thing to the same nervous system. The instrumentation is beside the point. The commitment is everything.
The ritual dimension matters and is worth naming directly.
Every major tradition of sacred music uses sustained sound, repetition, and the deliberate disruption of ordinary time perception. Gregorian chant, Tibetan overtone singing, the drone of the tanpura beneath Indian classical music, the call to prayer, these are not stylistic choices. They are technologies for producing specific states of consciousness, for moving the listener from the distracted ordinary mind into something quieter and more open and more available to experience.
Experimental electronic and electroacoustic music discovered this independently, through different means and without the theological framework, and arrived at the same technology. What Oliveros called Deep Listening, what Riley's repetitions produce, what Radigue's glacial synthesizer movements create over hours, what Young's sustained drones demonstrate with a kind of blunt insistence, is a shift in the quality of attention that has been recognized as valuable across virtually every human culture that has thought carefully about sound.
It's not mysticism. It's phenomenology. It's what actually happens to a human nervous system when you remove urgency and event and forward momentum and replace them with duration and presence and weight.
New listeners sometimes find this tradition impenetrable, and that's understandable.
Nothing in the experience of ordinary pop or rock or electronic dance music prepares you for a forty-minute piece that appears to do almost nothing. The instinctive response is to wait for it to start, and when it doesn't start, to assume you're missing something or that the music is failing to deliver.
You're not missing something. You're being asked to change modes. To stop waiting for the event and start attending to the environment. To let your idea of what music is supposed to do loosen enough that something else becomes possible.
The easiest entry points are the ones that maintain some connection to familiar forms. Eno's ambient records are melodic enough to feel welcoming while being spacious enough to do the work. Grouper's voice provides an anchor while everything else dissolves around it. Bohren's jazz vocabulary gives you something to hold onto while the tempo and atmosphere do their slow work. Chamber was built with this in mind too, frequency-heavy and patient but not opaque, not a wall you have to climb, more like weather you have to agree to stand in. From there the deeper waters open up: IN DRONE WE TRUST for the long form, You Will Know Them by Their Fruits for the full submersion, 4AU for the rawer, looser, live-room version of what these ideas sound like when four people play them simultaneously without a net.
And once you're in it, really in it, the experience is difficult to describe to anyone who hasn't had it. Music starts to feel different. Silence starts to feel different. The quality of your attention changes in ways that persist beyond the listening experience itself.
That's not a small thing to offer someone.
Most music gives you an experience and then it ends. The best work in this tradition gives you a different relationship with experience itself, with time, with presence, with the charged and necessary gap between things where, if you're patient enough and quiet enough and willing enough to stay, the real thing turns out to have been waiting all along.
This music isn't background. It isn't wallpaper. It isn't difficult for the sake of difficulty or minimal for the sake of fashion. It's a specific and serious and genuinely transformative way of working with sound, built over decades by composers and artists who understood that the most powerful thing music can do isn't to move you from one emotional state to another.
It's to make you more completely present in the one you're already in.
That's what heaviness actually is. Not volume, not aggression, not the number of distortion pedals between the guitar and the amp. It's the weight of full attention, fully held, for exactly as long as it needs to be. Everything in this tradition, from Radigue's barely-moving synthesizer tones to Khanate's barely-survivable slow motion collapse, from Bohren's three-in-the-morning jazz to the thick drone textures of IN DRONE WE TRUST, from the twenty-five minutes of "Fruits" to the thirty-three of "Vegetables" to whatever 4AU was and remains, is pointing at the same thing.
Weight is not what you add. It's what remains when you've removed everything that didn't need to be there.
